Stuff we felt like writing about

July 04, 2009

The Fourth of July

By Ron Beasley

Berkeley1972 It's the 4th of July, the birthday of this Republic.  It is a good day to think about how it all started.  That history has been re-written many times over the last 233 years so this might be a good day to make a resolution to become more informed.  A good place to start is  A Leap in the Dark: The Struggle to Create the American Republic by John Ferling.  You can find my review here. The writings of Thomas Paine are another must read.  You can find an online copy of Paine's Common Sense here or if you prefer a book The Essential Thomas Paine is a good one.  And you might want to take another look at the Adamses.  They are described as Americas first political dynasty.  The have been compared to today's Bush dynasty but even though both John and his son John Quincy are thought to have had failed presidencies it is horribly unfair to compare them to the Bush family.  Without John Adams there would not be a United States of America.  A good source of information on the Adams family is America's First Dynasty: The Adamses, 1735-1918.

June 30, 2009

The Drunken Scotsman

By Steve Hynd

My homeland has always had a reputation as a boozing nation. In fact, alongside our likewise hard-drinking cousins the Irish, the joke is that without alcohol we would have conquered the world. And we had a good stab at it even so, as the engine room of the British Empoire and originators of many of the ideas that ended up in the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights as a light for the world.

But alcohol has always been Scotland's bane, it's escape from social and economic deprivation that caused more poverty and heartache in return. Never more so than in recent years when it has fuelled a kife-and-yobs subculture which has seen violence soar to ignominious world-record levels (although murder rates are still lower than America's proving that guns don't kill people but they certainly help a lot). Moreover, when teens rebel against their elders they rarely err on the side of abstinence, and so Scotland has a problem with hard drugs which is a direct consequence of its drinking culture too.

So, a new study has been published which claims to show that, after taking into account road deaths and cancers caused by hard boozing, Scotland's drinking problem accounts for better than one in twenty of all deaths. That's one death every three hours and far higher, almost double, what earlier estimates had said. There are calls for the political parties to put aside their usual partisan sniping and take concrete action - including price fixing.

Dr Peter Terry, chairman of the British Medical Association Scotland, urged political parties to unite behind the SNP government's plans for minimum pricing to combat alcohol abuse.

Speaking at the BMA's annual conference, he said: "We must first stop the year-on-year increase in alcohol-related illness.

"The minority SNP government has proposed some quite radical legislative suggestions to tackle this problem, including a minimum unit price. In Scotland this suggestion will require the support of MSPs from the other political parties.

"I implore them to put party differences aside and provide that support. They, and the Scottish people they represent, must address the exponentially growing problem of alcohol-related disease in all its forms and the only proven way to do that is to include legislation on the price of alcohol as part of that strategy."

Labour spokesperson Cathy Jamieson endorsed Dr Terry's call for political unity.

She said: "We need a national consensus to tackle Scotland's hard-drinking culture involving all of our political parties, health organisations, the police and the industry itself. Labour has suggested a ban on billboards advertising alcohol near schools and a mandatory code of practice for retailers, but we will look seriously at any credible proposals from any source that will reduce the level of problem drinking in Scotland."

Tory health spokesperson Mary Scanlon warned the government should not rely on pricing as a "single tool solution".

The aim with such a price fixing policy would be to set the unit price high enough to deter, but not so high as to create a black market demand. Increasing the price would most effect young drinkers, who are most likely to binge-drink and suffer a higher than average number of alcohol-related deaths. But the Tories are also right that existing legislation, like that against licensed stores selling to under-age drinkers, is more often observed by breaking it than not.

Scotland has always had a drink problem, but now it is being forced to admit the true severity of that problem. One death every three hours in a population of about 5.5 million. Yet Scotland isn't that much more of a boozy culture than, say, Texas where I now live - and Texas' drunk-driving limits and enforcement are a joke by Scottish standards for just one example. Scotlands rude awakening should be an alarm call for others too.

June 29, 2009

Deep Thoughts

Commentary By Ron Beasley

The Obamas Find a Church Home — Away from Home

I look forward to the day when the U.S. President doesn't have to find a church.  Oh wait - Roanld Reagan never went to chruch.

June 28, 2009

Health Care and Rationing

Commentary by Ron Beasley

The New York Times reports, correctly, that there is little hope for "bipartisan" health care reform.  There may be a few who oppose a public plan for ideological reasons but the reality is the Republicans don't want to give the Democrats a victory on this because they know it will be popular.  In spite of the ads they may run they know that public health care is popular in Canada, Great Britain, France, Spain and everywhere else.  It is the third rail of politics in Canada and Europe and even the conservatives in those countries know not to touch it.  We saw what happened when George W. Bush tried to mess with Social Security, the third rail of American politics. 

We hear that a government run health plan will result in health care rationing. That's true but what they fail to mention is that we have that now. The reason the that the anti government plan marketing is not having any impact is that both those that have health insurance and those who don't know that we already have rationing. I have had two friends and one relative who have probably died before they should have because of rationing. Yes, they all had insurance but physician requests for diagnostic tests were rejected by private insurance companies until it was too late.

And there is another form of rationing – the preexisting condition of being between 55 and 65 years old. I will return to this later.

And then we have Medicare. Medicare will approve about anything and health care providers know that. See what a Texas town can teach us about health care in the New Yorker. To make matters worse these procedures are often not even in the best interest of the patient. I will give you a personal example.

My 86 year old mother is in really good health but had started to be short of breath. They ran some diagnostic tests and discovered she had a bad heart valve. She was referred to a cardiologist who was ready to split her chest open and replace the valve. I asked him several questions:


  1. She is in relatively good health now – following the surgery will she ever recover to be as good as she was before? The answer was probably not!

  2. I told the doctor that I heard that being on a heart lung machine can have a negative impact on memory and asked him if that was true. The answer was yes, especially in older people.

  3. The next question was what will happen if the valve is not replaced? The answer was the shortness of breath may gradually get worse.

  4. I asked him if it were his mother would he suggest the surgery? The answer was NO!


The bottom line is they were going to perform a procedure that would cost 50 thousand plus dollars that would have left my mother worse off after the surgery because Medicare would pay for it.

At 63 years of age I cannot get health insurance at any price. I am denied procedures that could keep me alive for another 20 or 30 years while Medicare pays for procedures that add little or even have negative impacts on the health of the patient. That's rationing and foolish.

There is health care rationing now and there will be rationing in any new system. Society simply can't afford to give everyone the care they might desire. So what is required is intelligent rationing. Will it be perfect?  The answer is no but it needs to be better than what we have now. That means that any government health plan needs to do a better job of of deciding which procedures are truly worth while. I would still feel better about a plan where profit was the major driving force even though it might not be perfect.

June 26, 2009

Tabloid Journalism or a Tabloid Population?

Commentary By Ron Beasley

The US and the World face a number of real and potential problems.  In case you forgot the US is supposed to be leaving the cities in Iraq in spite of an uptick in violence.  Things are not getting any better in Afghanistan either,  The US and World economies are still teetering on the edge of a depression.  But the entire media is once again morphed into the National Enquirer.  The tabloid journalism revolved around  another oversexed hypocritical Republican, Mark Sanford, until the death of Michael Jackson.  My initial reaction would be to criticize the media but that would be wrong I think.  The profit and viewer driven media is giving the the tabloid population what they want - news that looks like a reality show.  When our civilization finally collapses it won't be the result of the tabloid journalism but because tabloid journalism is what the people wanted.

So I've been quiet this week because I don't give a rat's ass about Mark Sanford or Michael Jackson.

Lensmen On The Big Screen?

By Steve Hynd

The London Times reports that a screenplay for a movie of E.E. "Doc" Smith's classic Lensman series of pulp SF novels is doing the rounds. Babylon 5 creator J. Michael Straczynski is responsible for the screenplay and director Ron Howard is reported to be interested.

Sure, the Lensman series was 40's American culture - sexist, racist, virulently anti-labor and arrogantly sure of it's own supremacy - brought into the far future. But where else will you find the line "armed and armored as only a planet can be armed and armored"? With modern CGI the effects are certainly doable, and would be the most mind-boggling array of movie incandescence ever seen. And with Straczynski doing the screenplay, I'd think the worst of the 40's-think would be either ameliorated or set into a context whereby you can smile wryly instead of growling angrily (think Sky Captain, maybe).

If it's done right it'll make the effects from Star Wars and Star Trek, Terminator Four and The Matrix look like cheap made-for-TV stuff. Seriously awesome.

Update: sfHeath makes a comment well worth promoting to the post itself because it's so correct.

Despite all the flaws you mention - I don't think I've read anything more overtly sexist, racist, and arrogant - I have always loved this series too. I think it's because the mythology of the series pre-supposes a perfect identification of ultimate authority. The lens cannot be faked, it's only given to the best of the best who only do good. And because they have that authority, they can command the entire resources of the planet - which of course results in complete and total war with the first alien race they find. (In all fairness, the aliens shoot first.) The pacing of the novels is a breakneck speed and the descriptions assault all the senses. Very powerful stuff for the young adolescent male I once was.

That adolescent fantasy, of following an ultimate authority who can do no wrong, has of course almost wrecked the USA; but in fiction, it's a great ride. Unlike some of our policy-setters, I know the difference between entertainment and reality.

Heh, that's a great comment, sf. The Lensmen series is very much "neocons in space", only with the pretense at democracy dropped of course. The perfect authorities, the lensmen themselves, rule with no oversight or hindrance.

June 24, 2009

Upset of the decade

By Fester:

The Detroit Lions will beat the New England Patriots and the Pittsburgh Steelers this year. Or at least the odds for that to happen are no worse than the odds for the United States to beat Spain in FIFA's Confederation Cup.

The USA team squeaked into the semifinals where they will play Spain in Confederation Cup odds as +1.5 goal underdogs on Wednesday at 2:25pm EST on ESPN.

Getting to the semifinals for the United States was a minor miracle but winning against Spain would be a major one. Spain has won 15 straight matches overall and is unbeaten in their last 35 matches....

odds at SBG Global have Spain -1.5 (-120) against the USA +1.5 (-120) with a Draw +350 and a betting total of 2.5 OVER -130 in soccer odds.

And now the results:

2120: Full-time Spain 0-2 USA Well, I wasn't expecting that - but was anyone? USA produce surely the greatest Confederations Cup shock to beat Euro 2008 champions Spain and secure a place in Sunday's final. Against either Brazil or South Africa - and no way am I calling that one now. We've missed you, football.



Wow! That is a shocker. I think I know what I'll be watching on the DVR during bottle time tonight...

June 21, 2009

Hypocritical Outrage

Commentary By Ron Beasley

The headline reads:

Under Pressure, Obama Calls on Iran to End Violence,

'Unjust' Actions In a statement that appeared to answer his critics who wanted him to speak out more forcefully, President Obama called on Iran to stop the violence and unjust actions against its people.

The outrage is from those who aren't old enough to remember or refuse to remember the not so distant history of the United States.  In the comments section of Steve's post below avedis says:

I do not see the Iranian government's reaction to the protesters as being - in and of itself - evidence of any unique oppressiveness. Had people in the US taken to the streets in the same manner after the Bush election and the Florida decision, believe me, there would have been an equal number of protesters beaten and killed. It's happened here before, you know.....that is what governments do when faced with determined unruly mass civil unrest.

For example how many remember Kent State:

On Monday, May 4, a protest was scheduled to be held at noon, as had been planned three days earlier. University officials attempted to ban the gathering, handing out 12,000 leaflets stating that the event was canceled. Despite this, an estimated 2,000 people gathered[16] on the university's Commons, near Taylor Hall. The protest began with the ringing of the campus's iron Victory Bell (which had historically been used to signal victories in football games) to mark the beginning of the rally, and the first protester began to speak.

Fearing that the situation might escalate into another violent protest, Companies A and C, 1/145th Infantry and Troop G of the 2/107th Armored Cavalry, Ohio ARNG, the units on the campus grounds, attempted to disperse the students. The legality of the dispersal was later debated at a subsequent wrongful death and injury trial. On appeal, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled that authorities did indeed have the right to disperse the crowd.

The dispersal process began late in the morning with campus patrolman Harold Rice, riding in a Guard Jeep, approaching the students to read them an order to disperse or face arrest. The protesters responded by throwing rocks, forcing the Jeep to retreat.

Just before noon, the Guard returned and again ordered the crowd to disperse. When most of the crowd refused, the Guard used tear gas. Because of wind, the tear gas had little effect in dispersing the crowd, and some began a second rock attack with chants of "Pigs off campus!" The students lobbed the tear gas canisters back at the National Guardsmen; however, they had put on gas masks upon first throwing tear gas at the students.

When it was obvious the crowd was not going to disperse, a group of 77 National Guard troops from A Company and Troop G, with bayonets fixed on their weapons, began to advance upon the hundreds of protesters. As the guardsmen advanced, the protesters retreated up and over Blanket Hill, heading out of The Commons area. Once over the hill, the students, in a loose group, moved northeast along the front of Taylor Hall, with some continuing toward a parking lot in front of Prentice Hall (slightly northeast of and perpendicular to Taylor Hall). The guardsmen pursued the protesters over the hill, but rather than veering left as the protesters had, they continued straight, heading down toward an athletic practice field enclosed by a chain link fence. Here they remained for about ten minutes, unsure of how to get out of the area short of retracing their entrance path (an action some guardsmen considered might be viewed as a retreat). During this time, the bulk of the students congregated off to the left and front of the guardsmen, approximately 150ft,(50m) to 225ft,(75m) away, on the veranda of Taylor Hall. Others were scattered between Taylor Hall and the Prentice Hall parking lot, while still others, perhaps 35 or 40, were standing in the parking lot, or dispersing through the lot as they had been previously ordered.

While on the practice field, the guardsmen generally faced the parking lot which was about 100 yards away. At one point, some of the guardsmen knelt and aimed their weapons toward the parking lot, then stood up again. For a few moments, several guardsmen formed a loose huddle and appeared to be talking to one another. The guardsmen appeared to be unclear as to what to do next. They had cleared the protesters from the Commons area, and many students had left, but many stayed and were still angrily confronting the soldiers, some throwing rocks and tear gas canisters. At the end of about ten minutes, the guardsmen began to retrace their steps back up the hill toward the Commons area. Some of the students on the Taylor Hall veranda began to move slowly toward the soldiers as the latter passed over the top of the hill and headed back down into the Commons.

At this point, at 12:22 PM, a number of guardsmen at the top of the hill abruptly turned and fired their M1 Garand rifles at the students. The guardsmen directed their fire not at the closest students, who were on the Taylor Hall veranda, but at those on the grass area and concrete walkway below the veranda, at those on the service road between the veranda and the parking lot, and at those in the parking lot. Bullets were not sprayed in all directions; instead, they were confined to a fairly limited line of fire leading from the top of the hill to the parking lot. Not all the soldiers who fired their weapons directed their fire into the students. Some soldiers fired into the ground, while a few fired into the air. In all, 29 of the 77 guardsmen claimed to have fired their weapons, using a final total of 67 bullets. The shooting was determined to have lasted only 13 seconds, although a New York Times reporter stated that "it appeared to go on, as a solid volley, for perhaps a full minute or a little longer." The question of why the shots were fired remains widely debated.

The shootings killed four students and wounded nine. Two of the four students killed, Allison Krause and Jeffrey Miller, had participated in the protest, and the other two, Sandra Scheuer and William Knox Schroeder, had been walking from one class to the next at the time of their deaths. Schroeder was also a member of the campus ROTC chapter. Of those wounded, none was closer than 71 feet to the guardsmen. Of those killed, the nearest (Miller) was 265 feet away, and their average distance from the guardsmen was 345 feet.

 And who does this sound like?

During a press conference, Governor Rhodes called the protesters un-American and referred to the protesters as revolutionaries set on destroying higher education in Ohio. "They're worse than the brown shirts and the communist element and also the night riders and the vigilantes," Rhodes said. "They're the worst type of people that we harbor in America. I think that we're up against the strongest, well-trained, militant, revolutionary group that has ever assembled in America."

From 1969 - 1972 I was in Germany and remember the reactions of the Europeans to the brutality in the United States.  Yes indeed - the Iranians are doing what governments do when faced with determined unruly mass civil unrest even here in the "land of the free."

June 09, 2009

Sometimes Nature Sucks

Commentary By Ron Beasley

Now I'm a conservationist and I love nature.  But there are times I don't like it in my backyard or front yard for that matter.  I live in the Portland Metropolitan area on the edge of the urban growth boundary.  I spend 40 to 60 dollars a year for deer repellent if I want to have roses.  But I have it easy.  Oregon is the beaver state and there are still a lot of beaver around - even in the metro built up areas.  They build dams on small creeks and flood houses and businesses.  Well it happens on the east coast too.

Return of the Once-Rare Beaver? Not in My Yard

09beaver-600 

CONCORD, Mass. — The dozens of public works officials, municipal engineers, conservation agents and others who crowded into a meeting room here one recent morning needed help. Property in their towns was flooding, they said. Culverts were clogged. Septic tanks were being overwhelmed.

“We have a huge problem,” said David Pavlik, an engineer for the town of Lexington, where dams built by beavers have sent water flooding into the town’s sanitary sewers. “We trapped them,” he said. “We breached their dam. Nothing works. We are looking for long-term solutions.”

Mary Hansen, a conservation agent from Maynard, said it starkly: “There are beavers everywhere.”

In the Portland area many of the small streams have been diverted into six or eight foot culverts.  That makes things much easier for the beaver.  Build a dam in front of the culvert and you have an instant lake.  Unfortunately the residents of the areas don't really want a lake in their backyards and basements.  They game commission has been trapping and relocating them but they never get them all and the dams and lakes return.  As for my deer problem - no solutions other than very expensive deer repellent.

I love nature. MorningDeer-1  But in my backyard - not so much!

June 06, 2009

Domestic Terrorists - The Christian Taliban

Commentary By Ron Beasley

The assassin who killed Dr. George Tiller at his church, murdered Tiller in order to keep him from performing therapeutic abortions for women. The murderer is one of a long line of religiously inspired radicals who have tried to shut down abortion providers through bombings and murders. They are not the mainstream of the pro-life movement; they are a fringe sect who are not content to protest abortion or even to engage in non-violent civil disobedience. Instead, they believe that they are justified in bombings and killings to prevent great evils that they regard as contrary to God's fundamental law.

Using violence-- like bombings and murders-- to intimidate people in this way is terrorism. It is so in common language, it is so defined in U.S. law. The terrorist in this case and the terrorists in previous abortion clinic bombings and murders are, as far as I am aware, not foreigners. They do not have Arabic or Islamic names. They are American and they live in the United States. However, just like Islamist terrorism, this terrorism is driven by fanatical religious belief. Many religiously inspired terrorists live in other countries; some, however, (who include both Christians and Muslims among their number) live in the United States and are U.S. citizens or resident aliens.

~Jack Balkin


 

Colleagues say Tiller knew something was coming

Two weeks before Wichita abortion doctor George Tiller was gunned down in his church, he called colleague Susan Hill in North Carolina.

Tiller wanted her to send pictures of activists who'd recently been threatening Hill and her staff. He said he was seeing new anti-abortion protesters outside his clinic and wondered if they were traveling around.

"I said, 'I don't know, George. I think there's something coming.'," recalled Hill, who operates clinics in four states. "He said, 'I do, too.'

“We knew it. You smell it. Strange things were happening in our Mississippi clinic and in North Carolina. Strange people were coming around. And he admitted that for the first time, he really believed that something was going to go down.”

In the days since Tiller's death, abortion rights activists across the country say they sensed an uptick in incidents and threats before the shooting. That included more people at protests, more clinic vandalism and more protesters singling out certain clinic employees or physicians with threats.

Violence at abortion clinics declined during the eight years of the Bush administration because the Christian Taliban had one of their own in the White House.  When a pro-choice president was elected in November it was inevitable that the violence, domestic terrorism, would increase.  And make no mistake these religious zealots are terrorists and even more dangerous than the ones residing in the mountains of Afghanistan and Pakistan. 

Jack Balkin wonders if they should be treated like terrorists.

(1) Should the United States be able to hold Roeder without trial in order to prevent him from returning to society to kill more abortion providers? If we believe that Roeder and other domestic terrorists will plan further attacks on abortion providers and abortion clinics if we let them free, can we subject them to indefinite detention?

(2) The Obama Administration is currently considering a national security court to make decisions about the detention of suspected terrorists, with the power to order continued preventive detention. Should this court be able to hear cases involving U.S. citizens, whether they are Muslim or Christian?

(3) The U.S. government has argued that at least some terrorists should not be tried through the criminal process with its various Bill of Rights protections but instead can and should be tried through military commissions, where the standards of proof and various procedural protections are lowered. If Roeder is a domestic terrorist, can the U.S. government subject him to trial by a military commission instead of a criminal prosecution? Although the current version of the 2006 Military Commission Act does not bestow jurisdiction to try citizens, could we or should we amend it to include citizens who we believe are likely to commit or have committed terrorist acts?

(4) One of the most important reasons for detaining terrorists (suspected or otherwise) is to obtain information about future terrorist attacks that may save lives and prevent future bombings. To procure this information, can the government dispense with the usual constitutional and legal safeguards against coercive interrogation? Should it be able to subject Roeder to enhanced interrogation techniques, including waterboarding and other methods, to determine whether Roeder knows of any other persons who are likely to commit violence against abortion clinics or against abortion providers in the future? Would your answer change if you believed that an attack on an abortion provider or a bombing of an abortion clinic was imminent?

(5) Terrorists and terrorist organizations need money and resources to operate effectively. Often the only way to stop them is to dry up their sources of financial and logistical support. Can the U.S. government freeze the assets of pro-life organizations and make it illegal to contribute money to a pro-life charity that it believes might funnel money or provide material support to persons like Roeder or to organizations that practice violence against abortion providers? Can the government arrest, detain, and seize the property of anti-abortion activists who helped Roeder in any way in the months leading up to his crime, for example by giving him rides or allowing him to stay in their homes?

Of course they shouldn't be treated this way.  It would be against everything this country stands for but the same can be said for the individuals who have already been so treated.

Commenting Policy

Google

Powered by TypePad
We are blogger-pundits, a role for which we are eminently qualified since, exactly like pundits on television and in newspapers, we have opinions, we write them down, and a lot of people read them. Yes, that’s all there is to it. Sorry, Mr. Broder.
~Digby