« The Wages Of Hate | Main | Holy Joe And The Invertebrates »

November 18, 2008

Mullen's Mission

By Cernig

Today, a friend sent me a PDF copy of Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Admiral Mullen unclassified new "CJCS strategic guidance" for 2008-09. It makes interesting reading.

Some first thoughts:

"We have the most combat-hardened forces in history."

That's hyperbole, right? Even if you just restrict it to American forces.

"Our Navy and Airforce are unmatched, although our advantage could easily slip."

Slip to who and over what period of time? There isn't a nation on Earth spends a fraction of what the U.S. does on the military, and the next three biggest spenders are all ostensibly allies (France, Britain, Japan). The US could cut its military budget by two thirds and still outspend all of its possible threats combined.

Mullen's version of the objective in Iraq and Afghanistan:

"...a representative, stable, independent Iraq that is an ally and regional leader, and a representative, stable Afghanistan and Pakistan that are allies and cooperative members of the international community..."

Is this in fact doable at any price America is willing to pay and over any forseeable timeline? And why don't Afghanistan - and Pakistan! - have to be "independent" too?

"In the near term, Al Qaeda sanctuaries in Pakistan are the probable source of a terrorist attack on the homeland.

So Mullen agrees with Hayden that Pakistan is the true central front in the so-called "War On Terror" (and one the US isn't actually at war in). Is the reason that Pakistan doesn't need to be independent contained therein, for the warmongers? That'll be why we invaded Iraq and sent Pakistan billions in military aid while helping prop up the people in Pakistan's military and intelligence services enabling those Al Qaeda safe havens. That makes perfect sense.

"The pace of ongoing operations has prevented our forces from training for the full spectrum of operations and impacts our ability to be ready to counter future threats...The imbalance between our readiness for future global missions and the wars we are fighting today limits our capacity to respond to future contingencies, and offers potential adversaries, both state and non-state, the incentive to act. "

Huh? I guess Mullen just parted company with his current boss, Bob Gates, about what the military should be arming and training to fight right now. "Full spectrum of operations" means tank battles in the Fulda gap and naval action off Taiwan. Russia and China are not credible "potential adversaries" for the forseeable future. I mean, seriously, what "potential adversaries" are there other than counter-insurgency and 4GW ones? This is all about the coming Pentagon budget turf-battles in the Obama administration, folks - laying out the fearmongering stall often and early. That's Mullens biggest mission right now.

Here's a link to a copy so you can read it for yourself:

Download cjcsguidancefor200820091.pdf

http://www.newshoggers.com/blog/2008/11/mullens-mission.html

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345f80b469e2010535f9587c970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Mullen's Mission:

Comments

"Battle hardened", eh?

Well, that is just so 2006.

http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/news/2006/060907-9-11.htm

"Rumsfeld recently used the term "battle-hardened" to describe U.S. troops. It was a controversial comment, but it is a paradoxical reality of the military profession.

"Battle-hardened; I love it," Courville said. "The reality of it is we have been there for a while, and that has made our military that much better. And it's just going to keep us that much better for years to come."

Uhm yeah, better and better.

They did not like the counterarguments then, either. From 2006 also...

"Cartoonist defends “battle hardened” cartoon from Joint Chiefs"

http://www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/02/02/cartoonist-defends-battle-hardened-cartoon-from-joint-chiefs/

I imagine that there are those, like Mullen, who continue to view an overstretched, increasingly worn out military (Even as American power fades as a direct result, and against the backdrop of an increasingly dire global economy, no less) as a means of attaining some kind of martial "perfection" (or something). I say God Bless 'em, and Jesus H. bless the arms manufacturers. For they will inherit the earth...by blowing it up.



The comments to this entry are closed.



------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------

Use an online petition to get help in promoting your cause

------------------------------------------




-----------------------------------------

------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------

Click here to visit
Powell's Books!

----------------------------------------

Follow Us On Twitter

Steve

Dave

Ron

John


-----------------------------------------

Google

Powered by TypePad

The Monster: How a Gang of Predatory Lenders and Wall Street Bankers Fleeced America--And Spawned a Global Crisis
By Michael W. Hudson
Read Ron's Review

The Collapse of Complex Societies
By Joseph Tainter
Read Ron's Review

Crossing Zero: The Afpak War at the Turning Point of American Empire
By Elizabeth Gould and Paul Fitzgerald
Reading Now

Thinking Points: Communicating Our American Values And Vision
By George Lakoff
Read Steve's Review

Invisible History:Afghanistan's Untold Story
By Paul Fitzgerald & Elizabeth Gould
Read Ron's Review

The Day We Found The Universe
By Marcia Bartusiak
Read Ron's Review

Science as a Contact Sport: Inside the Battle to Save Earth's Climate
By Stephen H Schneider
Read BJ's Review

Ayn Rand And The World She Made
By Anne C. Heller
Read Ron's Review

The Greatest Show On Earth: The Evidence For Evolution
By Richard Dawkins
Read BJ's Review

The Vanishing of a Species? a Look at Modern Man's Predicament by a Geologist
By Peter Edward Gretener
Reading

Thomas W. Benton-Artist/Activist
By Daniel Joseph Watkins
Read Ron's Review