« Resiliency Substitutes | Main | Blue Girl, Another Red State »

June 20, 2008

AP Says "Case Closed" - I Don't Think So

By Cernig

Kat passes on this in the WaPo today - the Associated press has released a statement saying it has come to an agreement with Rogers Cadenhead of Drudge Retort and now regards the recent uproar over its dubious definition of fair use as "closed". The full statement reads:

In response to questions about the use of Associated Press content on the Drudge Retort web site, the AP was able to provide additional information to the operator of the site, Rogers Cadenhead, on Thursday. That information was aimed at enabling Mr. Cadenhead to bring the contributed content on his site into conformance with the policy he earlier set for his contributors. Both parties consider the matter closed.

In addition, the AP has had a constructive exchange of views this week with a number of interested parties in the blogging community about the relationship between news providers and bloggers and that dialogue will continue. The resolution of this matter illustrates that the interests of bloggers can be served while still respecting the intellectual property rights of news providers.

Over at his personal blog, Rogers confirms that he's resolved his personal dispute but adds that his own agreement:

...does nothing to resolve the larger conflict between how AP interprets fair use and how thousands of people are sharing news on the web. You could probably guess that by the lack of detail in AP's statement...If AP's guidelines [due out on Monday - C] end up like the ones they shared with me, we're headed for a Napster-style battle on the issue of fair use.

...Although AP will be releasing guidelines, I don't think the news service will be able to concede any ground to the blogosphere. AP sells headline and lead-only services to customers. Asking the company to concede there's a way people can share this information for free is like asking the RIAA to pick its favorite file-sharing client.

If an expansive view of fair use is to remain in place, it's incumbent upon bloggers and our $500-an-hour friends in the legal community to define our own guidelines and fight for them. If we don't, big media companies will eventually define them for us, just as they've gotten the Digital Millenium Copyright Act and Copyright Term Extension Act passed in Congress. (Emphasis Mine - C]

In other words, this isn't over by a long chalk. Which means that Newshoggers, like many other larger and smaller blogs, will be keeping our boycott of AP in place. AP's clients will be missing our readers and those of many other blogs, who might have been sent to their sites by our links and thus have generated advertising revenue for them. AP will also have to contend with the PR challenge of such a continuing boycott. It's the only real leverage we've got against a company that wants one rule for itself and another rule for others.

Update: Mike Masnick at TechDirt:

for an organization claiming that it wants to be a part of the conversation (and some have noted that "conversations" rarely begin with a legal threat), never actually coming out and talking in public seems quite problematic. So far, the public communication from the AP has been (1) identical cut-and-pasted comments on a number of blogs, (2) a couple of quotes given to reporters, (3) possibly some private discussions with unnamed bloggers, and (4) a private meeting with a representative for the Drudge Retort. There wasn't a single attempt to have a public discussion. There's no explanation of the resulting "agreement" or how it might impact other bloggers who quote the AP. There isn't even a single indication from the AP that it recognizes why so many people are upset.

That's not a resolution. That's denial.

Update 2: Fester has an amusingly wicked idea to increase pressure on AP.

Uplogo300

http://www.newshoggers.com/blog/2008/06/ap-says-cased-c.html

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345f80b469e200e5537e610d8834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference AP Says "Case Closed" - I Don't Think So:

» The party is just getting started from The Mahatma X Files
contra AP, the deeper issues have not been addressed. There's some mention of the potential for the Napsterization of news articles if AP has its way. You reme ... [Read More]

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.



------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------

Use an online petition to get help in promoting your cause

------------------------------------------




-----------------------------------------

------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------

Click here to visit
Powell's Books!

----------------------------------------

Follow Us On Twitter

Steve

Dave

Ron

John


-----------------------------------------

Google

Powered by TypePad

The Monster: How a Gang of Predatory Lenders and Wall Street Bankers Fleeced America--And Spawned a Global Crisis
By Michael W. Hudson
Read Ron's Review

The Collapse of Complex Societies
By Joseph Tainter
Read Ron's Review

Crossing Zero: The Afpak War at the Turning Point of American Empire
By Elizabeth Gould and Paul Fitzgerald
Reading Now

Thinking Points: Communicating Our American Values And Vision
By George Lakoff
Read Steve's Review

Invisible History:Afghanistan's Untold Story
By Paul Fitzgerald & Elizabeth Gould
Read Ron's Review

The Day We Found The Universe
By Marcia Bartusiak
Read Ron's Review

Science as a Contact Sport: Inside the Battle to Save Earth's Climate
By Stephen H Schneider
Read BJ's Review

Ayn Rand And The World She Made
By Anne C. Heller
Read Ron's Review

The Greatest Show On Earth: The Evidence For Evolution
By Richard Dawkins
Read BJ's Review

The Vanishing of a Species? a Look at Modern Man's Predicament by a Geologist
By Peter Edward Gretener
Reading

Thomas W. Benton-Artist/Activist
By Daniel Joseph Watkins
Read Ron's Review